Source eWEEK Friday, October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
| |
Here's an excerpt from the
latest in a series of articles tracking the Furthermore versus Mambo dispute.
eWEEK's Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols writes,
"Despite stories you may have read elsewhere, Futhermore's legal claims
against the Mambo community are still as good, or bad, as they ever were. One of
the problems with this fight has been that many open-source supporters keep
trying to see it as a battle between good open-source people and evil
proprietary software goons. It's not. It never was.
As Philip H. Albert, a partner in the San Francisco-based law firm Townsend
and Townsend and Crew LLP, told me last week, "This is, as described, not really
an open-source case. It's more a matter of copyright infringement and contract
law where it just so happens that the people being accused do open source.'"
For the complete article, click here.
|